"CATAPULT THE PROPOGANDA." -George W. Bush

Friday, September 30, 2005

Two More Baseless Rumors

MUSIC +++ FILM +++ SPORT +++ PHOTO +++ LINK +++ POORLY REASONED POLITICAL OPINION AND STUPID JOKE

ALC
...And in Berks County, PA last month, Judge Jeffrey K. Sprecher dismissed criminal charges against a man accused of buying beer for his underage neighbor. Charges were dismissed, ruled the judge, because the prosecutor had not proven all elements of the crime. More specifically: there was nothing in evidence to suggest that Miller Genuine Draft could rightfully be called "beer."

POL
...And in politics, Rep. Tom DeLay, as you know, has stepped down ("temporarily") as House Majority Leader, given his indictment by a Texas grand jury. DeLay maintained his infamous calm demeanor, calling the proceeding one of the worst injustices in American history and accusing the prosecutor of being a filthy partisan hack -- not, as many have pointed out, that DeLay would know. (As for the injustice part, it seems if Texas goes to the trouble of tracking you down and bringing you in, you're pretty much guilty as sin. Or black.)

One disturbing trend: I'm in a hurry at the moment, and have Googled several combos of the story, looking for DeLay's exact quote; only blogs and months-old unrelated news items come up. In fact, like any good American, I heard about the story on the day in question as I strolled into my corner internet coffee shop, and passed a newspaper stand with DeLay plastered above the fold. Sure enough, I went to CNN.com, and there was ABSOLUTELY NO MENTION of the story anywhere.

Good work, people. Smoke if you got 'em.

Still, even for jaded old me, it's hard to squelch a smile. You know -- the one that accompanies the thought: "We got the bastard."

MR

QWTOFDY
"Why, why do they laugh at my mighty sword?"
-Randy Newman

Monday, September 12, 2005

Deathbed Reflections

MUSIC +++ FILM +++ SPORT +++ PHOTO +++ LINK +++ POORLY REASONED POLITICAL OPINION AND STUPID JOKE

Since Brown's been shitcanned already ("already"),

SPRT
The man everyone loves and no one likes is back: Barry Bonds, batting cleanup tonight at a theater near you. There's no question local fans will give him a long, rousing ovation, albeit peppered with boos. One reason you'll never see Bonds as an L. A. Angel (of A.) or New York Yankee is he'd never enjoy the narrow but unshakable measure of unconditional admiration we Bay Area fans provide him.

The man can do no wrong. He's more popular than O.J. Simpson.

One note, however: the Giants themselves don't much seem to want him around. Umpteen straight postseason runs were one thing. But this team has heard all year about how bad they are without Barry and the Barca that they've grown physically sick at the mention -- while proving the beat men right. It became a self-fulfilling prophesy.

Why? Don't much matter. Mostly because the team is old, their manager old and laid-back. No one, with the exception of Omar Vizquel and a couple of young pups incidental to the blueprint, had the fight to drag the team out of its season-long malaise.

Felipe Alou was asked yesterday if the Giants could still make a playoff run, even though Bonds' return finds them in third place, seven games back of the equally depressing Padres with twenty to play. Ever the aged philosopher, Alou responded, "We are making a run. I don't know which way we are running."

The players don't want Bonds back. That's what I'm saying. Like a petulent child, perhaps, who knows he needs discipline. They'll stop resenting him soon, when they see that even in his fattened, immobile state he's good for three more baserunners a night.

But ultimately, local columnist Bruce Jenkins called it late last week, when the Giants snuck to within four games only to drop the next span like hot lead: the Giants aren't in it, and they never were in it -- not for a single day.

And standing 6'3", in his seventh year out of UCLA -- Baron... DAVIS!

POL
A quick P.S., on the heels of this week's Real Time with Bill Maher, adorned with an impressive performance from a bitter, well-armed George Carlin. Only one line of the hour-long show drew spontaneous, rowdy applause; it was Carlin's, a flat statement on the obvious, currupt sham our current "leaders" represent.

The country really is clueing in to the fact that people, as a whole, are being phased out of the govenmental equation. (Kurt Vonnegut, as a guest panelist via satellite, mused that humans have become a blight on the planet, whose immune system is trying to get rid of us, and, without sounding regretful, that it may already be too late.)

There's no longer a real court. No longer a real President. We can do what we want with the constitution, given, as Carlin sites, that a quarter of Americans walking the streets believe the sun revolves around the Earth. Supposing, unlike, say, the Democrats (played by the San Diego Padres), we manage to harness our power, our outrage, our numbers.

A question: In these days, of smart bombs, digital satellite imagery, and, well, the Patriot Act... is revolution possible?

How would it start? Have our founding "fathers" and our current population somehow failed each other, locking us in to a system we don't want and can't shed?

Think about it. Supposing Bush, I don't know, pushes through an amendment ending term limits, and brokers a contract merging Hummer, NexTel, and Homeland Security. Suppsing he bombs San Francisco, Seattle, New York.

How would it start? How would we overcome?

Is there anything we can do?

Don't give me the vote. Give me a gun. Give me numbers.

Is it, indeed, too late?

MR

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."
-Abraham Lincoln

Friday, September 09, 2005

How Do You Spell "Was Very Important Man In Charge Of Things?"

MUSIC +++ FILM +++ SPORT +++ PHOTO +++ LINK +++ POORLY REASONED POLITICAL OPINION AND STUPID JOKE

KATR
Keep in mind, it's a loaded question. Keep in mind, we're upside down, hanging from our toenails, snot dribbling backwards up our septums and seeping into our frontal lobes.

"What does it take to be FEMA chief?" FEMA stands for Federal Department of Responding to Emergencies and Hurricanes. It's staffed by the Department of Homeland Security, which stands for reading your mail, and which is staffed, in turn, by a conglomorate created as a last gasp by ENRON and Halliburton executives: namely, the Bush-Cheney administration.

So, as you try to snort the snot back into your nasal cavity, ask yourself first: "What does it take to be UN Ambassador?" We know the answer to that one. Confirming John Bolton in that position is like bringing in a Holocaust denier to head your Jewish Studies department.

"What does it take to be FEMA chief?" Well, it's no wonder he lied on his resume. (That's right, the White House press site describes the man in question, Michael Brown, as "overseeing emergency services divisions" in bustling Edmond, OK in the '70s "as an assistant city manager with emergency services oversight." In fact, the man was an assistant TO the city manager -- also known as a secretary -- with no oversight or supervisory privileges of any kind.)

"What does it take to be FEMA chief?" Your job is mainly to, how to phrase this exactly? RESCUE PEOPLE FROM EMERGENCIES. Or, as some people (like Brown himself) interpret it, you're to wait around for five hours, then shoot off a memo reminding coworkers to spin a "positive image" of your response.

So what does it take to be FEMA chief? You have to be run out of your last job, your resignation demanded after a spate of litigation and financial descrepancies.

Oh, and what must your last job have been? To be FEMA chief, your last job must have been Judges and Stewards Commissioner for the International Arabian Horses Association.

International... Arabian... Horses... Ass... ociation.

Tune in again next week for: "What does it take to be President of the United States of America?"

MR

QWTOFDY
"You are like a hurricane --
There's calm in your eye --
And I'm getting blown away..."
-Neil Young